[Kabar-indonesia] 'We Hope Lapindo Will Keep Its Promise:' Environmentalist
JoyoNews at aol.com
JoyoNews at aol.com
Fri Oct 6 23:16:07 MDT 2006
The Jakarta Post
Saturday, October 7, 2006
'We hope Lapindo will keep its promise': Environmentalist
The hot mud that is surging from PT Lapindo Brantas Inc.'s gas well in
Sidoarjo, East Java, has remained unstoppable after over three months. The
government's decision to take over the handling of the disaster through a national team
for mudflow control gives the impression that the company is shirking its
responsibilities. The deputy director of the East Java Forum for the Environment
(Walhi), Catur Nusantara talked to The Jakarta Post's Indra Harsaputra about
the issue.
Question: What do you think about the government's decision to handle the hot
mudflow?
Answer: From the beginning, Lapindo has never been serious about handling the
mudflow problem, which began on May 29. With the increasing complexity of the
issue due to the absence of a lasting solution, President Susilo Bambang
Yudhoyono has finally instructed the national team for mudflow control in Sidoarjo
to take measures to deal with the case.
In my view, the takeover was very late because the social problem of mudflow
victims was already complicated. Now the local people don't trust anybody, not
even the media and environmental activists, let alone the government and
Lapindo. Even if the national team is serious about tackling the hot mudflow, it
needs to work hard. Besides, it should be transparent in explaining to the
public via the media what has actually happened and what concrete steps are to be
taken by the victims, who have been living in even more dire conditions.
The national team has explained to journalists the government's plans,
including its measures to rescue surrounding village communities. But the plans are
conceptually unclear. An example is the statement of (energy minister) Purnomo
Yusgiantoro on the declaration of a state of emergency and danger. In his
description, the dangerous status is to be announced when hot mud threatens the
safety of residents, destroys infrastructure and paralyzes East Java's economy,
and under such circumstances mud water can be dumped into Porong River. At
present, the government has declared a state of emergency but hot mud water
continues to pour into the river. It's odd, as the mud water must in no way go to
Porong River under the emergency status. Wasn't it at the request of local
residents that the mud water be immediately discharged into the river?
The majority of residents indeed agreed with the prompt disposal of hot mud
water into Porong River and it's this local demand that eventually led to
Sidoarjo Regent Win Hendrarso's decision -- though still without Environment
Minister Rachmat Witoelar's recommendation -- to dump it into the river. All this
had some reason. Lapindo came up with the idea of speedily dumping hot mud water
into Porong River for the purpose of hastening problem settlement and saving
its budget.
While preparing pipes and pumps for the discharge, Lapindo also sought the
services of researchers from several universities to support the claim that the
mud water and also hot mud contained no poison. The results were disseminated
by the media to ease public worries about the mud water discharge.
Mudflow victims themselves had no choice but to agree with the disposal of
untreated mud water into the river. First, they were in a difficult position
with their homes being surrounded by hot mud ponds over five meters high. Second,
there was no guarantee from Lapindo and the government for public safety and
against the risk of any pond breach. Inevitably, they agreed and even staged a
demo by blocking the Surabaya-Gempol turnpike and the Porong highway to urge
the immediate removal of the mud. So it's true that some interested parties
persuaded local communities to accept the mud water discharge offer?
The interests connected with Lapindo's mud issue are endless. Various parties
have obviously joined the game. Even among Sidoarjo's Nahdlatul Ulama (NU)
circles, Walhi was once rumored to share some interests in order to prevent the
NU from filing a joint lawsuit with Walhi. The media was also reportedly
playing a part by writing stories in favor of Lapindo. In Porong, facts can be
distorted. Those with certain interests may emerge as heroes by blaming others
genuinely struggling for the victims. Among the victims themselves there are
interested people trying to seek personal profits from the sale value of land, by
working as brokers to fix their neighbors' land prices. Therefore, they are
ready to support whatever plan and program is offered by the government and
Lapindo, even if it's unfavorable to local villagers. Mostly called Lapindo's
brokers, they have contributed to attempts at persuading residents around the well
site. If the situation is dangerous and threatens the safety of the local
population, will Walhi agree with the disposal of hot mud water into the river
and sea?
We have expressed our disagreement from the start despite the treatment of
hot mud water. But if it's too late and inevitable, Walhi will have to make the
only choice of dumping mud water into Porong River as long as it is treated
and the outcome of this treatment is transparently announced to the public
before its discharge. In reality, the mud water is now flowing into the river. Is
Walhi going to sue Lapindo?
Yes, we're planning to sue Lapindo, the regional administration and the
central government for the environmental damage. We don't trust the survey results
stating that the untreated hot mud water is safe for the river and the marine
environment. Wahli regrets the fact that academics who have a social
responsibility delivered the survey findings. What is happening in Porong is a series
of deceptions. We hope the value of honesty will be apparent in court and the
truth can be exposed. Is Walhi convinced that Lapindo will settle the payment
of compensation money to mudflow victims?
No, we're not, and the compensation will not be evenly and fairly
distributed. As I've earlier said, the hot mudflow has never been seriously handled. It's
because of the tug of war between Lapindo and the government. Indirectly, the
government should have shared the responsibility, but Vice President Jusuf
Kalla at first expressed the government's disapproval of any spending on the
Lapindo case. Meanwhile, Lapindo had indeed wished to shift the crisis handling
to the government. Still, after some time the government eventually took over
the control of the hot mudflow and this opened a big chance for Lapindo to
evade its responsibility. We hope that Lapindo will keep its promise and remain
prepared to pay whatever amount of compensation is agreed on to the rightful
victims.
------------------------------------------
Joyo Indonesia News Service
------------------------------------------
More information about the Kabar-Indonesia
mailing list