No subject
Tue May 1 19:37:24 MDT 2007
for two of the bombs. Both say Dulmatin assembled the triggers and helped make
all three bombs. But unlike Amrozi, neither Samudra nor Ali Imron said Dulmatin
detonated the Sari bomb.
Ali Imron's testimony is the most recent, given to police on Thursday night
after he was flown to Bali from East Borneo, where he was arrested on Monday.
He took police to a boarding house in Denpasar which was the headquarters for
the bomb plot. Police knew it existed, but not its location. Ali Imron still
had the key to the front door. He told police that he and Samudra had paid a
year's rent in advance, posing as cargo agents and telling the landlord they
were from Sumatra.
It was to this house that Amrozi delivered the van and explosives. Ali Imron's
story is that he and Idris helped Dulmatin make the bombs, promoting Idris, who
hitherto had been described by police as a quartermaster who arranged
accommodation and supplied the mobile phones. They combined potassium chloride,
TNT and an unidentified black powder and tested a small bomb in the garage.
Alarmed neighbours where told an electrical implement had exploded. They
believed the explanation, but the plotters had taken an alarming risk which
would have horrified better disciplined terrorists.
When it comes to events on the night of the attack, important elements of Ali
Imron's testimony are hard to believe.
Police say Ali Imron told them that Samudra, the overall commander, remained in
the safe house in Denpasar. Ali Imron described himself as the "field
commander". He said he and another plotter drove the van with the bomb to Jalan
Legian. Who was the other man? Ali Imron wasn't sure. He thought his name was
Jimmy, which might be an alias for Iqbal. This is farce. Police have never
heard of Jimmy before. Ali Imron was the "field commander" of a conspiracy
about to commit mass murder, he was transporting the bomb - and he didn't know
the identity of the man sitting next to him. "He's lying," police said.
Police said Ali Imron claims he stopped the van 800 metres from the Sari Club,
got out and was picked up by Idris, who had been following on a motorbike. The
van drove on, Ali Imron and Idris returned to Denpasar to the al-Ghorobah
mosque near the safe house. Their roles ended, they prayed for success and were
in the mosque when the bomb exploded. They expressed their joy.
Three days later, Ali Imron changed his story, claiming that Idris detonated
the Sari bomb. By then however his testimony had little credence, containing
too many inconsistencies. Police believe he is lying to minimise his role. By
escalating the role of Idris from quartermaster to master bomber, it is
possible that Ali Imron is sacrificing a more expendable Idris to protect
someone else, possibly himself.
Ali Imron says Iqbal or Jimmy parked the van outside the Sari Club and went
into Paddy's. This links neatly with what already has been established by DNA
on body parts recovered from Paddy's and which were identified as belonging to
Iqbal. He took a backpack bomb into the bar and was killed when it exploded.
How this happened is a matter of intense speculation.
Samudra, when caught on November 21, boasted that Iqbal was a suicide bomber,
which Indonesian police never tire of denying, justifiably afraid of allowing
the conspirators to claim a martyr as a role model for their "Jihad".
Police claim Ali Imron's account supports their version of an accidental early
detonation. This is that Samudra used a mobile phone to detonate the third bomb
near the American consulate in Denpasar. The signal prematurely detonated the
Sari and Paddy's bombs, catching Iqbal unawares.
But there is no evidence to back this theory, and even the police have no idea
how one mobile could activate three mobiles simultaneously with a single
message. Another version is that the mobile message to activate the consulate
bomb somehow "crossed over" into the two other mobiles, although police once
again are unable to explain how this could happen. These attempts at
explanation lack credibility, especially since Amrozi is insistent that the
three mobiles had to be activated individually.
The consulate bomb harmed no one. It was clearly a symbolic attack on the
United States. "Destroy America," Samudra shouted when he was arrested. But
Samudra has made no reference to this bomb.
So is Ali Imron telling only part of the truth to conceal a greater guilt by
his mentor? Why give only this pathetic gesture to Samudra? He was their
inspirational leader, the toughest and most experienced terrorist among them, a
religious zealot who had fought in Afghanistan, and who, police say, has
confessed to participating in a series of bomb attacks in Indonesia in December
2000.
Why give Samudra only one bomb, and the least important? Why not all three,
especially the Sari bomb, which was what the plot was all about? He was the
fittest, the most deserving to deliver such a devastating message to their
enemies. He was also in command, the man most willing and able.
More light needs to be shone into this world of shadows, to establish what are
truth, deception and lies. In only three months, the Indonesian police have
done a remarkable job, and there is every reason to accept their confidence
that they will arrest the suspects still at large, especially those they want
most: Idris, Dulmatin, Wayan and another bomb expert, Dr Azhari, a Malaysian.
They have struck a significant blow against JI in Indonesia. One of their
prisoners is Mukhlas, another brother of Amrozi, and he is their most important
captive so far. Mukhlas, 42, a religious teacher and veteran terrorist who
spent more than 10 years in Malaysia, is said to be JI's operations commander
for South-East Asia, the No. 3 man in the hierarchy. Like Samudra, another big
loss for JI, Mukhlas went to Afghanistan and is accused of initiating the plan
for the bomb attacks and ordering its execution.
Another prisoner is Mubarok, who was captured with Ali Imron. Mubarok played no
direct role in the bombings but on Mukhlas's orders financed the operation,
using part of the $90,000 which a separate cell got by robbing a jewellery
store in Serang, East Java, two months before the bombing.
The arrests give an alarming insight into JI's capabilities. The group was able
to provide a cadre of committed, experienced terrorists with sophisticated
technical skills, along with the resources to finance and plan the operation.
But they exposed a fatal weakness: a reliance on passionate amateurs to be the
ground troops, in recruiting Islamic fundamentalists from religious schools.
Mukhlas recruited two blood brothers, Amrozi - whose carelessness in buying the
van in his own name gave police their initial breakthrough - and Ali Imron,
plus two stepbrothers.
A difficult task for JI will be replacing the veterans Mukhlas and Samudra. But
there is no shortage of eager volunteers among the fundamentalist Islamic
religious schools of Indonesia and Malaysia.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bali: counting cost and rebuilding tourism
By Simon Osborne
UPI Business Correspondent
Published 1/21/2003 12:17 PM
JAKARTA, Indonesia, Jan. 21 (UPI) -- The bombing in Bali last Oct. 12 killed
nearly 200 people, knocked half a percentage point from Indonesia's gross
domestic product growth of 3.5 percent, and exposed the country's frailties as
a safe tourist destination.
Hotel occupancy rates in Bali dropped to single figures after the blasts. To
break even they need about 20 percent to 40 percent occupancy. The tourism
business is worth $5.4 billion in revenue to Indonesia each year, with Bali,
which attracts 1.5 million tourists per year, accounting for a third of that
sum.
Spotting the goodwill of Western tourists toward the Kalimantan rainforests,
the Sumatran tiger and the orangutan, Indonesia's Ministry of Culture and
Tourism had designated 2002 as National Eco-tourism year. It was a catchy title
designed to appeal to the environmentally sensitive, post-modern traveler,
though beyond invoking the "eco" buzzword, there was no particular effort made
to protect any creature unlucky enough to be born in an Indonesian forest or to
stop slashing and burning its habitat. In the middle of 2002, land clearance
fires in Indonesia smoked up all of the neighboring countries.
A similar commitment to image over substance had emerged at the Association of
South East Asian Nations Tourism Forum in Yogyakarta in January 2002. ASEAN
tourism ministers and industry players agreed to promote the region as a safe
destination for tourists. Predictably, nothing was materially done to make the
region safer, but in the spirit of pro-activity they decided to brand the area
as being harmless.
The response of embassies to the bombing was to rationalize after the event,
with travel warnings issued by British, Japanese, Australian, German and United
States governments advising their vacationers not to travel to Bali. The advice
now of the British Embassy is that the situation in Bali has "stabilized." By
this choice of words, they simply mean that there has not been another bomb.
Fourth quarter arrivals to Bali usually account for 30 percent of the year's
total. November 2002 arrivals fell to 32,000 tourists, when more than 100,000
would normally be expected. In December, visitor numbers picked up to 63,000.
Surprisingly, occupancy rates at the hotels in the busy Kuta Beach area, the
scene of the bombing, fared better in December than the secluded boutique
hotels of central Bali, which would not ostensibly appear such attractive mass
targets to terrorists.
Western tourists remained nervous and in general stayed away, with the increase
in December being the result of Christmas visits from stoic, north Asian
tourists seduced by the bargains. Additionally, there was heavy demand for
short breaks from Jakarta residents for whom a hazardous Bali is still
preferable to the urban nightmare of Indonesia's capital.
"This tragedy has put Bali in a high position," the Head of the Bali Tourism
Authority declared. "Nobody blames Bali."
Whether this declaration that all publicity is good publicity is no more than a
gormless gaffe, it represents one in a series of official attempts to gloss
over the new role of Indonesian tourist as soft terrorist target. Having lulled
tourists into a false sense of security with the 2002 ASEAN campaign, there
seems no reason why anyone should not believe that he remains in a state of
denial.
Having collared the alleged gang of bombers, all of whom cheerfully confessed,
though none of these confessions are admissible as court evidence, the
Indonesian government allocated $4.6 million for a global promotional campaign
to lure back tourists to Bali. Its gift for responding to serious problems with
appealingly titled campaigns had temporarily deserted the spin doctors, who
gave the marketing drive the un-poetic name of "Bali, get into it."
'The Government is expecting that by the end of 2003 the country's tourism
industry would regain its attractiveness for world travelers," Minister of
Culture and Tourism I Gede Ardika said.
Private enterprise, no doubt fearful of the effects of government and ASEAN
platitudes, responded with their own crusade. The Bali Chamber of Commerce and
Industry Chairman I Gede Wiratha said, "Bali businessmen have decided to join
hands, without involving the government, to launch their own campaign to assure
world travelers that Bali is safe."
They decided to call their campaign "Bali for the World." In recognition that
merely joining hands would be unlikely to prevent the physical devastation of
another bomb, their workmanlike solution has been simply to offer discounts on
holiday packages.
What the tourist is being asked to predict is whether lightning can strike
twice in the same place. Tourists returning to Bali have made a calculated
decision that there will be no second attack. Thankfully, fewer people in the
South Tower of the World Trade Center were as dismissive when its neighbor was
struck. The Bali bombers took the ferry across to the island, and drove into
Kuta Beach. There is nothing to stop another group of terrorists following the
same path, and there are no reports of other sleeper cells being arrested.
So are there any causes for optimism? Even though they were not the
perpetrators, the Indonesian based Islamic group Laskar Jihad announced its
dissolution immediately after the Bali bombing, realizing they and their human
rights risked becoming as endangered a species as the Sumatran tiger.
Whilst there is no news of potential terrorists being incarcerated, the
implications of the empty jail cells may be just as revealing. In Indonesia,
potential terrorists now risk being silently exterminated in a publicity-free
way for which the custodians of Guantanamo Bay camp might be full of envy. As
the career aspirations of bombers are curtailed, a greater future danger for
tourists in Indonesia could be that of kidnapping. This form of crime, long
popular in neighboring Philippines, has never been popular among Indonesian
thugs, but may prove to be a money-spinner for them in future.
Behind the scenes, there are tangible efforts that promise to make Bali a safer
place. Still to be formally announced or publicized is the prospect of a 9/11
emergency and accident response system, similar to that for visitors to the
United States, which will be implemented for international tourists to Bali.
This scheme, which will be surcharged to air tickets in the form of an
insurance premium, will be backed by the International Association of Travel
Agents and will accommodate a well-equipped hospital and a fleet of
helicopters. Emergency teams will be incentivized by a reward for the first to
respond to a call-out.
Whilst responses and medical treatment should improve as a result, this program
cannot prevent the planting of bombs, and so it is understood that to deal with
the residual terrorist threat, the Indonesian government has approached anti-
terrorist consultancy vehicles established by foreign governments. They will be
mandated to provide pre-emptive, counter-terrorism operations in Bali.
Beyond the gnomic comments of Indonesian politicians and travel agents, there
may be some hope that the Bali of the future will be a safer place, but until
then, beware the glib re-assuring spin from Indonesia's beleaguered hospitality
industry.
-- Copyright © 2001-2003 United Press International
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BBC
Monday, 20 January, 2003, 08:20 GMT
Timor ex-police chief convicted
A special Indonesian human rights court has sentenced a former East Timor
police chief to three years in jail.
Hulman Gultom was convicted for failing to stop his subordinates carry out two
attacks in 1999, as violence raged over East Timor's vote for independence from
Indonesia.
He is the fourth person to have been convicted by the court, which has been
criticised by human rights activists for acquitting 11 other defendants.
The court found that Gultom, former police chief of East Timor's capital Dili,
failed to stop attacks on the home of a prominent pro-independence leader,
Manuel Carrascalao, in April 1999, and on a church building in Dili in
September 1999.
A total of 14 people were killed in the attacks.
Presiding judge Andriani Nurdin said Mr Gultom "has been found guilty of grave
human rights violations".
Gultom, who remains free pending an appeal, complained about the verdict.
"I have risked my life to prevent the riots but I have been found guilty," he
said.
Flaw
The Jakarta court was set up because of international pressure on Indonesia to
tackle human rights abuses committed as it withdrew from East Timor.
Before the verdict on Gultom was handed down, only three defendants had been
found guilty.
One of these, the notorious pro-Jakarta militia leader Eurico Guterres, was
sentenced to 10 years in jail in November.
At least 1,000 people were killed before, during and after East Timor's
overwhelming vote, in August 1999, to break away from 24 years of Indonesian
rule.
Rights experts have noted that a key flaw of Jakarta's human rights court is
its failure to try top officers, including the presiding commander at the time
of the violence, General Wiranto.
In December, the panel of five judges found Dili's former military commander,
Lieutenant Colonel Soejarwo, guilty for similar charges, including a September
1999 attack on the office and home of Roman Catholic Bishop Carlos Ximenes
Belo, just days after the vote.
Soejarwo has said he would appeal against the verdict.
*****
COURT RECORD:
Four people guilty
Eleven acquitted
Three await verdicts
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Age (Melbourne)
Raids raise fears of renewed violence
January 21 2003
By Jill Jolliffe, Atsabe, East Timor
The hamlet of Tiarlelo is only a few kilometres from Atsabe, itself 25
kilometres from the East Timor border, but the rough jungle track that leads to
it emphasises its isolation.
When well-armed, masked assailants struck at nightfall on January 4, it was
close enough for gunfire to be heard in the town, but distant enough for it to
be cut off from help.
When police arrived at first light, they found one man dead and three people
wounded, including two children. In a simultaneous attack at Laubuno, 14
kilometres away, two were killed and several wounded.
Four more bodies have been found since, leaving a death toll of seven. One was
hanged, another decapitated, and two men who had been kidnapped days earlier
were buried in shallow graves.
The use of automatic weapons and the discovery of bullet casings from
Indonesian-issue SKS rifles raised fears that the attacks represented a militia
incursion from West Timor.
The arrest several days later of eight armed men in the Liquica region
confirmed the concern. Testimony was given in Dili court that seven armed
groups had crossed the border to kill former resistance leaders, under orders
from members of the Indonesian army.
Foreign Minister Jose Ramos Horta said he was convinced that there was no
Indonesian Government strategy to destabilise East Timor, but there might be
rogue Indonesian elements involved.
"With all Indonesia's troubles, East Timor is not on its radar screen at the
moment," he said. "My concern is how we can get senior officials in Jakarta to
pay attention, and alert Megawati (Sukarnoputri, Indonesia's President)."
To this end he called in Kristio Wahyono, head of Indonesia's diplomatic
mission. The ambassador had earlier told The Age that he had travelled to
Atambua to consult commander Lieutenant-Colonel Tjuk Agus and militia leader
Joao Tavares.
"Both told me no ex-militias had crossed the border and attacked Atsabe," he
said. "If anyone did, there were certainly no instructions from the Indonesian
military."
After the attacks, East Timor's President Xanana Gusmao headed an emergency
meeting in Dili, after which UN administrator Kamalesh Sharma signed an
agreement allowing the new East Timor Defence Force to mount a counter-
insurgency operation in the area. This waived existing accords placing the
force under UN command and ignored a clause of the Timorese constitution
prohibiting the army's use internally.
A week later the scene around Atsabe evoked the years of guerrilla resistance,
with camouflage-clad East Timorese scouring the jungle for infiltrators,
commanded by Sabika, a former resistance hero who is now a lieutenant-colonel.
Before 1999 their weapons were few and their clothes ragged, but now they
carried American-supplied M16 rifles and wore neat, new uniforms.
Mr Sharma said on Friday that East Timorese forces had arrested 66 people,
identified as militia members by the local population. However, most of those
arrested were members of Colimau 2000, a religious group widely suspected of
robbery and extortion. Denounced by neighbours, they were arrested and handed
over to police for transport to Dili jails. In Lemeia Kraik, known as a Colimau
stronghold, 59 people, including children, were arrested, to the disquiet of
human rights observers. Of 31 Colimau members taken to court on Friday, 28 were
freed for lack of evidence.
The facts emerging from the Liquica district arrests are more worrying. They
suggest that these were militia incursions and were backed, as Mr Ramos Horta
suggested, by junior Indonesian officers.
Miguel Freitas Metan, 45, is among those remanded for 30 days on immigration,
security and illegal arms charges. Speaking in Dili prison, Metan, a native of
Liquica, said he had lived since 1999 at Hali-Ulun, near Atambua in West Timor.
He said seven militia units received instructions from Indonesian army officers
with East Timorese links to cross the border for guerrilla actions.
During the 14-day trek to Liquica, his group of eight men had a change of heart
and surrendered in their home village on January 14. Members of the other six
groups are still at large.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Australian
Timor's incursion crisis plea
By John Kerin and Monica Videnieks
January 22, 2003
EAST Timor is facing the greatest threat to its stability since independence
with its security forces struggling to repel Indonesian military-backed militia
raids - and claiming Australia won't fully commit its peacekeepers to the
struggle.
A senior East Timor government official said yesterday the security situation
in the fledging nation had deteriorated to its worst level since before
independence last May.
"Militia are coming across the border (from Indonesian West Timor) in an
organised fashion and people are once again living in fear," the official told
The Australian yesterday.
"We need help and if Australia wants to ensure continuing stability for East
Timor then these elements need to be dealt with. Australia has forces here and
it must do something."
The official claimed the UN peacekeeping force was refusing to get involved in
what UN commanders insisted were local policing matters, and East Timorese
police and defence forces were unable to cope.
The Timorese want Australian troops, in particular, to give direct military
assistance in combating the internal security threat, which they say is
sponsored and supported by elements of Kopassus, the Indonesian army's
notorious special forces.
The security deterioration could force Australia, which currently has 1000
peacekeepers in the troubled new nation, to maintain troops there into 2004 and
beyond. The UN peacekeeping mandate expires in May but the Australian
Government is already expected to extend its commitment at least to the end of
the year.
East Timorese politicians and officials believe the UN force is scaling down
its security role at a pace too fast for the local police and military to cope
with.
There have been two serious incursions so far this month by West Timor-based
militias.
According to a police report obtained by The Australian, on January 13 a group
of nine militia armed with homemade knives and guns attacked villagers in the
Bazartete district near Liquica. About 100 villagers overpowered and captured
six attackers.
Under interrogation, militia leader Miguel Metan admitted to having "been armed
by Kopassus" with the instruction to "kill the village chiefs, political
leaders and those who go against them".
Earlier, on January 4, six militiamen armed with AK-47s attacked another
village and killed four East Timorese. They were driven off only after
Portuguese troops assigned to the UN force intervened.
The East Timorese claim they appealed for Australian help to repel the January
4 raid but were rebuffed.
Labor's foreign affairs spokesman Kevin Rudd, who recently met East Timor's
Foreign Minister, Jose Ramos Horta, said the deteriorating security situation
was gravely concerning.
"At a time when John Howard is forward deploying 1500 troops to Iraq, we face
an emerging security crisis in East Timor where Australia's 1000 peacekeepers
are already stretched to the limit," Mr Rudd said.
"The Government of East Timor is now deeply concerned about the increasing
penetration of its sovereign territory by militia forces from the West," he
said.
He urged Foreign Minister Alexander Downer to raise with the Indonesian
Government the role of Kopassus forces in co-ordinating militia raids into East
Timor.
But a spokesman for Mr Downer said last night he had met Mr Ramos Horta only 10
days ago and the East Timor Government had made no request for extra help.
"If there was a serious problem you would think it would have been raised at
that meeting."
The spokesman said Australia's peacekeepers in East Timor were under the
command of the UN, bound by the mandate and subject to the direction of its
commanders.
More information about the Kabar-Indonesia
mailing list